How Harmful Is PFAS in Drinking Water?
- Last updated: July 10, 2025
-
Contributor:
nicky
PFAS in drinking water has become a focus of public-health discussions in the United States, as federal agencies and local communities grapple with contamination reports and emerging health data. PFAS refers to a large group of manmade chemicals, including PFOA and PFOS, that can persist in the environment for decades. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), most Americans have already been exposed to some level of PFAS, often through drinking water or consumer products. We examine how these substances enter water supplies, why health experts are concerned, and what regulatory measures are in place to protect people from potential risks.
How does PFAS get into drinking water?
PFAS often migrate into drinking water from industrial sites, firefighting foam use, and consumer-product manufacturing. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), these chemicals do not break down easily, so they can build up in water sources over time. Industries that produce or use PFAS — such as paper mills, textile manufacturers, and metal-plating facilities — may discharge wastewater containing PFAS into streams or groundwater. In addition, firefighting foams used at airports and military bases have historically been a major source of PFAS leaching into soil and water.
Some private wells near industrial or military sites can become contaminated without homeowners knowing. In 2021, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) tested community water supplies to assess the presence and scope of PFAS in drinking water, highlighting that contamination can appear unexpectedly. Although significant efforts are underway to reduce PFAS releases, these chemicals’ persistence means it can take considerable time and resources to restore contaminated water sources to safer levels.
What makes PFAS dangerous even at low levels?
PFAS resist traditional breakdown processes, enabling them to travel through soil and remain in groundwater far longer than many other substances. Their longevity means small concentrations can accumulate over time, potentially reaching levels that concern health agencies. The EPA notes that even low concentrations can be problematic due to the potential for bioaccumulation in the human body. Exposure can occur over years, with repeated consumption of contaminated drinking water gradually increasing the total amount present in tissues.
Additionally, younger populations may face extra risk. Studies cited by the CDC suggest children can be exposed to PFAS in utero or through breast milk if their mothers have measurable levels in their bloodstream. This early-life exposure, combined with infants’ developing immune and organ systems, has raised questions among researchers about the long-term risks children may face.
Health effects of PFAS in drinking water
Health researchers continue to investigate a broad spectrum of possible effects linked to different PFAS types, exposure levels, and durations. According to the CDC, laboratory findings point to a variety of possible outcomes if PFAS levels exceed certain thresholds:
Potential liver and kidney damage
Immune-system disruptions
Changes in cholesterol levels
Possible developmental effects in infants
Scientists emphasize that much depends on the specific chemical, as well as the duration and intensity of exposure. Some PFAS, such as PFOA, have been replaced by other variants in many industrial applications. However, each replacement still requires close scrutiny because PFAS generally share the core characteristic of resisting environmental breakdown.
Further concerns center on the potential link between PFAS exposure and certain cancers. Ongoing investigations examine whether prolonged contact with higher concentrations can raise the incidence of conditions like kidney cancer and testicular cancer. Current evidence is still evolving, prompting many scientists to call for additional research to define safe exposure levels precisely. For more specific information on conditions under study, see our resource on pfas and cancer.
What do the EPA and CDC say about PFAS safety?
The EPA and CDC have taken increasingly active stances as PFAS data accumulates in scientific literature. In early 2024, the EPA announced National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for six PFAS chemicals, specifying legally enforceable maximum contaminant levels (MCLs). The agency projects that these regulations could prevent thousands of serious PFAS-related illnesses over time.
Meanwhile, the CDC analyzes population exposure trends through programs like the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). CDC data shows that most Americans have trace amounts of PFAS in their blood, but exposure can vary by occupation, geography, and drinking water source. The agency suggests that individuals who live near facilities linked to PFAS production or usage may experience above-average levels.
“Some PFAS chemicals can accumulate in the body over time,” the CDC stated, noting that health effects can be more potent for those with higher or prolonged exposure.
As scientists continue to examine PFAS toxicity, both agencies appear committed to monitoring new research and updating guidelines accordingly. State-level regulators are also stepping in, with some states introducing stricter standards than federal guidelines require.
Are there legal limits for PFAS in drinking water?
Yes. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, the EPA has the authority to set legally enforceable regulations known as National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWRs). These entail monitoring, treatment, and reporting requirements for public water systems. In March 2021, the EPA published Regulatory Determinations that included a final decision to regulate PFOA and PFOS in drinking water. By early 2024, the agency formalized MCLs for multiple PFAS, including PFOA and PFOS individually, along with other PFAS through a Hazard Index approach.
Some states have also set their own standards or guidelines. For example, in 2025, the IEPA established health-based groundwater quality standards for PFAS, setting levels as low as 2 parts per trillion (ppt) for certain compounds to as high as 2,000 ppt for others. States with stricter rules often aim to protect populations deemed most vulnerable, including pregnant women and children.
Regulations continue to evolve, driven by scientific discovery and public advocacy. We see a trend toward lower permissible levels as evidence of health concerns grows.
Which states have the highest PFAS water levels?
PFAS contamination patterns can vary widely, typically reflecting industrial histories and firefighting practices at local bases. Some states, such as Michigan and New Jersey, have been at the forefront of testing and regulation. These programs frequently uncover hotspots near factories or training sites where firefighting foam was used.
A broader view of contamination patterns can be found through statewide testing initiatives. Public data from sources like the EPA and state environmental agencies can show local water systems with PFAS detections above recommended thresholds. Some advocacy groups also maintain resources similar to a pfas contamination map to pinpoint potential problem areas.
Communities in Alabama, Minnesota, and parts of North Carolina have also reported elevated PFAS levels, according to local environmental departments. However, nationwide data collection remains incomplete, and ongoing monitoring efforts may reveal new areas where PFAS levels exceed health-based recommendations.
Can home filtration systems remove PFAS?
Many homeowners turn to in-home treatments to address PFAS in drinking water. Common methods include activated carbon filters, ion exchange resins, and high-pressure membrane filtration such as reverse osmosis:
Activated carbon: Granular activated carbon (GAC) filters can remove many PFAS molecules. This method is widely adopted and often cost-effective. However, effectiveness varies by water flow rate, contact time, and the type of carbon media.
Ion exchange: Ion exchange resins chemically bind negatively charged PFAS molecules. These resins can be more efficient than carbon for certain short-chain PFAS, but they cost more and require proper disposal or incineration.
Membrane filtration: Reverse osmosis or nanofiltration membranes can remove over 90 percent of PFAS, including short-chain variants. They typically produce a waste stream requiring careful disposal. Homeowners with private wells may opt for point-of-use systems — such as under-sink or countertop units — for extra PFAS removal.
For more information on filtration, visit pfas water filter or explore how different technologies stack up at pfas treatment technologies. We also outline popular questions at do carbon filters remove pfas and does reverse osmosis remove pfas.
What should you do if PFAS is found in your water?
If testing confirms PFAS in your drinking water, there are steps you can take to minimize exposure while working toward a more permanent solution:
Confirm laboratory results. Contact a reputable pfas testing lab that conducts methodology recommended by the EPA.
Consult local agencies. Check with local utilities or state environmental agencies to learn about any ongoing remediation efforts or advisories.
Use certified treatment systems. Look for filters independently certified to reduce PFAS. A qualified water-treatment expert can recommend an appropriate system based on your test results.
Maintain filters regularly. Carbon media and membranes lose effectiveness if not replaced on schedule. Regular testing can verify continued performance.
Explore alternative water sources. Consider bottled water or bulk water deliveries if the contamination levels are substantially above the recommended guidelines.
Residents on public water systems may be covered by local PFAS monitoring efforts. For private wells, consistently check contamination levels, especially if industrial sites or firefighting foam usage is known nearby. Additional guidance can be found at pfas remediation, as removing PFAS from groundwater or municipal systems often involves community-wide strategies.
Can you file a claim if PFAS contaminated your water supply?
Individuals who discover PFAS contamination in their water may be eligible for legal action, especially if they have experienced health issues potentially linked to these chemicals. Certain lawsuits have named chemical manufacturers or other entities as defendants, arguing negligence in releasing PFAS into local environments. We encourage those who suspect harm from contaminated water to seek a free case review.
If you have experienced PFAS exposure and want to explore your legal options, visit the PFAS lawsuit resources at Legal Claim Assistant. Filing a claim may help you obtain compensation for medical expenses, property-value loss, or other damages associated with contamination. For cases involving corporate negligence or industrial discharge, courts may review documentation that links specific PFAS types to known sites of origin.
Those who wish to learn more about liability structures can also see pfas liability. Determining eligibility for a case often involves medical records, water-testing results, and expert testimony linking exposure to documented health outcomes.
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
Is all PFAS exposure equally harmful?
Not necessarily. Different PFAS compounds carry varying levels of toxicity, and outcomes depend on exposure frequency and concentration, along with individual factors such as age and existing health conditions.
How can we reduce our exposure to PFAS in daily life?
Apart from filtering drinking water, consider limiting use of products that may contain PFAS, such as certain nonstick cookware and firefighting foam. A broader overview is available at pfas in products.
Can boiling water remove PFAS?
Boiling does not remove PFAS. Since PFAS molecules are structurally stable, heat typically will not break them down, and evaporation can even concentrate these chemicals if water volume decreases.
Do shorter-chain PFAS pose a lower risk?
Shorter-chain PFAS may be less prone to bioaccumulation but can still affect health. Research is ongoing to determine whether purportedly safer PFAS substitutes carry similar concerns.
Who pays for large-scale PFAS cleanups?
Costs often fall to municipalities and water utilities, sometimes aided by state or federal funding. However, if legal action finds specific parties responsible for contamination, those parties may face cleanup or settlement costs.
Where can we find updates on PFAS regulations?
The EPA regularly updates its website with new rules or advisories, and many states provide online databases listing testing results at local water systems.
When should we speak to a professional about potential health impacts?
If you or your loved ones experience health changes potentially linked to PFAS, consult a healthcare provider. You may also choose to consult an attorney specializing in water-contamination cases.
Related Article
What Philips CPAP Machines Are Recalled and Why
