PFAS in Minnesota

Last updated: July 16, 2025
Contributor: nicky

I have spent considerable time examining the ongoing concerns around PFAS Minnesota faces today. PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) have drawn attention from health agencies, private citizens, and regulators alike. These synthetic chemicals have been used in consumer goods and industrial applications for decades. Now that we know they can linger in the environment and in our bodies, the question for many Minnesota residents is straightforward: how much risk do PFAS pose, and what can we do about it?

In this article, I want to walk through what PFAS are, where they come from, and how they might be affecting our water, soil, and overall health. By providing a balanced overview, I aim to offer insights into Minnesota’s strategies for confronting PFAS contamination. I will also explain how individuals who believe they have been harmed by PFAS might seek legal help, including how Legal Claim Assistant offers guidance on PFAS lawsuits.

What are PFAS and why are they a concern in minnesota?

PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a large group of human-made chemicals. They are prized by certain industries for their heat resistance, water repellence, and chemical stability. These qualities mean PFAS do not break down easily in natural environments. Because of that, they are often referred to as “forever chemicals.”

In Minnesota, PFAS have attracted scrutiny due to multiple factors. According to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), thousands of businesses may use or process these chemicals in some capacity. State agencies have found that PFAS can leach into groundwater and surface water, contaminating drinking water sources, soil, and local ecosystems.

A significant part of the Minnesota PFAS conversation involves major manufacturers. The state settled a high-profile lawsuit with 3M, alleging that the company’s chemical production damaged drinking water and natural resources. Following that settlement, Minnesota implemented an extensive PFAS Blueprint. This strategy coordinates research, health guidance, and practical measures intended to manage, prevent, and clean up PFAS pollution.

I have seen how communities across the state have become more cautious about these “forever chemicals.” As research continues, Minnesota officials have begun setting new guardrails for industry, monitoring contamination in many settings, and applying new technologies to remove PFAS from the environment.

Where are PFAS found in minnesota?

State agencies consider PFAS hazardous substances. They have been found in various parts of Minnesota, affecting regions that host different types of facilities or industrial sites. Here are some of the common sources:

Landfills. Solid waste landfills in Minnesota have historically accepted products containing PFAS, leading to leachate contaminated with these chemicals. According to the MPCA, at least 100 sites in the Closed Landfill Program show PFAS in groundwater.
Industrial facilities. Manufacturing and plating plants may produce PFAS byproducts or use PFAS-containing products. PFAS can end up in air emissions, wastewater, or stormwater that eventually flows into local water bodies.
Composting sites. State research indicates that PFAS can appear in compost contact water, especially if the original materials (such as paper waste) contained PFAS coatings.
Military bases and airports. Firefighting foams used in training exercises often contain PFAS. These foams seep into soil and water during routine drills or emergency events.

Because Minnesota is large and industrially diverse, PFAS contamination does not follow a single pattern. Some towns have observed PFAS in their city wells; others see elevated levels near waste disposal or industrial sites. A robust monitoring plan, among the most comprehensive in the nation, helps identify where PFAS levels concern public health and how best to address them.

Find out if you're eligible and may be eligible for compensation.

Get your Free Case Review and Maximize You Payout With the Help From Legal Claim Assistant.

Get A Free Case Review

Free

PFAS in Minnesota’s drinking water

Drinking water has been a top focus in the PFAS Minnesota story. The chemicals can infiltrate municipal systems when groundwater or nearby waterways are contaminated. Private wells are also vulnerable. According to Minnesota’s PFAS settlement with 3M for USD 850 million, a primary goal is ensuring clean and safe drinking water in the southeast Twin Cities metro area. The state deploys technology funded by this settlement to remove high concentrations of PFAS from local water supplies.

There is ongoing research on the link between PFAS-contaminated water and negative health outcomes. Studies suggest that consistent exposure may pose risks over time, including certain cancers, thyroid complications, and more. Because of emerging evidence, state agencies monitor municipal water sources intensively. Local health departments also encourage private well owners to stay informed and consider testing if a property sits near a known PFAS site.

PFAS removal from water involves specialized filtration methods, like granular activated carbon or ion exchange systems. In some cases, advanced technology can actually destroy PFAS removed from contaminated water. Minnesota is one of the first state governments in the United States to use such state-of-the-art technology, according to the MPCA.

If you believe PFAS-filled water has harmed you or your community, you may want to explore legal remedies. In certain cases, individuals, families, or entire neighborhoods have pursued legal action to secure compensation for medical costs or infrastructure upgrades. For additional information about taking such steps, you can look into a dedicated resource on water contamination claims at this page.

PFAS in minnesota’s soil and agriculture

Soil can become contaminated when PFAS-containing wastewater or landfill leachate migrates into the ground. Agriculture, while vital to Minnesota’s economy, is not exempt from PFAS exposure. Manure or biosolids from wastewater treatment plants sometimes contain PFAS. When these materials are spread on fields, they can introduce contaminants to the soil.

I have read about farmers who worry about PFAS building up in irrigation water or in soils that handle industrial byproducts. Crops in contaminated soil might show trace amounts of these substances, although the level of uptake depends on the crop type and the specific PFAS variant. Meanwhile, concerns arise over livestock watering from PFAS-laced sources, potentially affecting meat or dairy products.

The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is designated to oversee PFAS use in certain agricultural products, including pesticides and fertilizers. This work involves rulemaking processes, along with monitoring how PFAS could move from farmland into local water supplies. While agricultural PFAS concerns are still under study, state authorities encourage caution, robust testing, and pollution prevention tactics to protect both farmers and consumers.

Health effects of PFAS exposure

Health agencies worldwide, including the Minnesota Department of Health, classify PFAS as substances that may harm human health if people ingest them in sufficient quantities over a long period. Because PFAS persist in the body, even low concentrations consumed regularly can accumulate. Research continues to uncover links between PFAS and various health conditions, though the exact extent of risk can vary by individual genetics, amount of exposure, and other lifestyle factors.

Key potential health impacts:

Immune response changes.
Liver damage and higher cholesterol levels.
Reproductive and developmental problems, including low birth weight.
Increased risk for certain cancers.

When I look at the data, I notice that these health risks become especially concerning for pregnant individuals, young children, and immunocompromised people. The National Toxicology Program and other scientific bodies still evaluate how PFAS contribute to long-term health changes. Minnesota has published health-based guidance values to inform residents about recommended limits in drinking water. While those limits aim to minimize risk, experts caution that ongoing research might prompt regulatory updates.

PFAS-linked diseases in minnesota

Minnesota has tracked cases of various diseases in communities with known PFAS exposure. Researchers strive to determine whether elevated rates of certain conditions are clearly tied to PFAS. Although not every study shows the same results, findings from agencies like the Minnesota Department of Health point to multiple illnesses warranting particular attention.

Kidney cancer

Kidney cancer has appeared in some PFAS studies as moderately associated with long-term exposure. This cancer type can develop over years, triggered by cell changes in kidney tissue. The Minnesota Department of Health continues to evaluate kidney cancer trends in regions identified with higher PFAS levels.

If you suspect you are at risk, a medical professional could recommend regular checkups or lab tests. Early detection often improves treatment outcomes. Speak with your doctor about potential PFAS contact, especially if you rely on private well water near a known contamination site.

Testicular cancer

Research indicates testicular cancer might be linked to prolonged PFAS exposure in certain populations. While it does not guarantee a diagnosis for individuals exposed to PFAS, it raises a red flag about possible connections. In Minnesota, health guidance suggests that young adults in high-exposure communities pay extra attention to any warning signs or symptoms.

Those concerned can speak with healthcare providers about screening options. Even though testicular cancer is relatively rare, acknowledging PFAS as a risk factor helps communities stay proactive. Statewide data collection will shed more light on any patterns connected to PFAS sites.

Thyroid disease

Thyroid hormones play a crucial role in metabolism, growth, and development. PFAS exposure can interfere with thyroid function, according to some scientific studies. Individuals may experience hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid), hyperthyroidism (overactive thyroid), or autoimmune conditions like Hashimoto’s disease.

Minnesota’s public health agencies are exploring how PFAS might contribute to overall thyroid disease rates. If you live in an affected region and notice changes such as unexplained weight shifts or fatigue, speaking with a doctor about potential PFAS exposure is wise. Blood tests, along with measurements of thyroid hormone levels, can help determine if there is a correlation.

Liver damage and cholesterol changes

PFAS have been observed to affect liver enzymes, resulting in potential liver damage or metabolic disorders. Elevated cholesterol levels are another concern. While many factors can influence cholesterol, PFAS exposure appears to be one piece of the puzzle. The Minnesota Department of Health has flagged this area for ongoing research.

Local clinics sometimes check for PFAS in blood serum if there is a documented exposure risk. If you suspect liver or metabolic issues linked to PFAS, working with physicians to monitor your enzyme levels and cholesterol can provide clarity. Symptoms like persistent fatigue, abdominal discomfort, or unexplained jaundice may warrant further investigation.

How minnesota is responding to the PFAS crisis

Minnesota has taken several notable steps to address PFAS contamination. One of the most prominent examples is the 3M settlement, totaling USD 850 million. These funds support projects that ensure communities have access to safe drinking water, including the deployment of advanced water-treatment technologies.

Minnesota’s PFAS Blueprint:

Pollution prevention plan: Aims to phase out avoidable PFAS use by 2032.
Comprehensive monitoring: Covers large industrial sites, landfills, stormwater facilities, and more.
Cleanup and remediation: Funding for new decontamination methods that remove or destroy PFAS.
Rulemaking: Prohibitions on the sale of products with intentionally added PFAS by 2032, barring currently unavoidable uses.

Legislation known as Amara’s Law further restricts PFAS usage in products. Industries must comply with reporting requirements, disclosing when their goods contain intentionally added PFAS. This transparency allows the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to track and regulate PFAS more effectively. The phased approach gives businesses time to adapt to new, cleaner product formulas and to eliminate unnecessary uses of PFAS.

Looking ahead, I see the state continuing to refine its response as more data become available. Officials encourage active participation from residents, community organizations, and scientific experts. Public hearings and meetings foster dialogue around proposed regulations, ensuring that Minnesota’s PFAS strategy remains informed and balanced.

Can you test your water or soil for PFAS in minnesota?

Yes, many Minnesota residents have their properties tested, especially if they suspect contamination. Certain local health departments or the Minnesota Department of Health can guide you on certified labs that perform PFAS analyses. For drinking water, tests measure PFAS concentration in parts per trillion (ppt). If levels exceed health-based guidance, you may consider installing a filtration system.

Soil testing can reveal if your farmland or backyard contains PFAS, but it is typically more specialized and potentially costly. In some cases, you might want to consult agricultural extension offices or environmental consultants to decide if soil sampling is necessary. I always recommend you start by confirming whether your locale is included in any official PFAS monitoring programs or advisories.

Some labs now provide home test kits. Though convenient, make sure the lab you choose follows EPA-approved or other validated methods for PFAS analysis. If you receive results above recommended thresholds, it may be prudent to discuss next steps with local environmental agencies or legal counsel.

Do you qualify for a PFAS lawsuit in minnesota?

If you have suffered injury or incurred expenses related to PFAS exposure, you could qualify for legal recourse. Individuals or communities who can link health problems, property damage, or significant financial loss to PFAS contamination sometimes seek compensation from polluters or manufacturers. The prominent litigation against 3M underscores how legal action can drive corporate accountability and fund remediation projects.

Specifically, you may be eligible if:

You live or lived near an industrial area, landfill, or firefighting training site with documented PFAS releases.
Your drinking water tested above permissible PFAS values, and you experienced related medical conditions.
You faced costs for specialized filtration systems or healthcare bills stemming from PFAS-linked illness.

Legal cases involving PFAS can be complex. They often require scientific evidence, medical tests, and in-depth environmental data. Lawsuits may mesh with broader multi-district litigation that targets specific companies. For instance, some litigants have participated in legal actions regarding DuPont; you can learn more details about such cases at this page.

Minnesota laws around PFAS are evolving. If you believe you might have a valid claim, consider consulting a lawyer who specializes in environmental or toxic tort litigation. Thorough documentation, like water test results and medical records, could play a significant role in the success of your claim.

Why choose legal claim assistant

Choosing the right legal resource is essential when you are battling large corporations or tackling complex scientific questions. I have seen how the right support can streamline the process of filing a claim and connecting with knowledgeable attorneys.

Legal Claim Assistant provides a free case review for individuals concerned about PFAS contamination. Over the years, they have developed relationships with law firms that specialize in environmental litigation. Their service helps simplify the steps of sharing your evidence, understanding your legal options, and potentially joining larger class actions or consolidated proceedings. If you decide to pursue a claim related to PFAS Minnesota concerns, exploring all your options can help you find the best path forward.

You can learn more about general PFAS legal claims by visiting this dedicated resource.

Frequently asked questions (FAQ)

PFAS contamination in Minnesota has raised urgent questions about health risks, water safety, and legal rights. Below, we’ve answered the most common questions from residents, landowners, and families concerned about exposure. If you still need help, our team is here to provide personalized support.

How do I know if my area in Minnesota has PFAS contamination?

According to state officials, Minnesota has one of the most comprehensive PFAS monitoring plans in the country. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health publish data on contaminated areas, especially around landfills and industrial sites. If you suspect your area is affected, you can check online resources from state agencies or contact your county health department for test results.

Can PFAS be removed from my drinking water?

Yes, PFAS can be filtered out using methods such as granular activated carbon or reverse osmosis systems. Some Minnesota utilities already use advanced filtration to meet state guidelines, especially in the East Metro area that benefits from 3M settlement funds. If you rely on a private well, you can contact certified labs to have your water tested and explore system upgrades if needed.

Is it safe to eat crops grown in contaminated soil?

That depends on the specific PFAS levels in your soil and the type of crop. While some plants do not readily absorb PFAS, others may. Ongoing research in Minnesota is evaluating how best to limit PFAS uptake in agricultural settings. If you are concerned, you can test your soil or contact agricultural extension experts for guidance on mitigating potential risk.

What is the government doing about PFAS in Minnesota?

Minnesota has a PFAS Blueprint that outlines prevention, management, and cleanup strategies. The state also has a pollution prevention plan aiming to phase out most PFAS uses by 2032, as well as regulations that require product manufacturers to disclose intentionally added PFAS. Settlement funds from 3M help deploy cutting-edge technology to remove PFAS from water. State agencies encourage public input and hold regular stakeholder meetings to refine regulations.

How long do PFAS stay in the body?

PFAS are often called “forever chemicals” because they do not easily break down in the environment or in human bodies. Some PFAS compounds can linger in the bloodstream for years before they are partially excreted. This persistence can lead to higher internal concentrations if people maintain frequent or high-level exposures.

Can I sue if I was harmed by PFAS in Minnesota?

Yes, if you can show that PFAS contamination affected your health, property value, or finances, you may have standing to file a lawsuit. Many cases involve medical expenses, water filtration costs, and damages related to long-term exposure. Because these lawsuits can get complicated, you might consider reaching out to an organization like Legal Claim Assistant for a free evaluation of your potential claim.

If you do not feel your matter aligns with a mass tort or class-action suit, you can still explore alternatives such as individual personal injury claims. It is advisable to gather medical records, water or soil test results, and any property-value data reflecting the negative effects of PFAS. Having this information ready will help you and your attorney build a comprehensive case.

I know PFAS contamination is not solely a Minnesota issue. If you have loved ones elsewhere, they may find local guidance from resources such as Georgia or California. Ultimately, the path to cleaner water and safer living environments requires diligent monitoring, informed community engagement, and firm regulatory action. By understanding your rights and available remedies, you can better protect yourself, your family, and your community from the health risks posed by “forever chemicals.”