PFAS in North Dakota
- Last updated: July 16, 2025
-
Contributor:
nicky
I have been reviewing data and local accounts about per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in North Dakota, and I want to share what I have discovered. PFAS contamination, sometimes called “forever chemicals,” is receiving heightened scrutiny as federal agencies, researchers, and state programs work to measure its effects. According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), at least 45% of tap water in the U.S. is estimated to contain one or more PFAS compounds, making it a national concern. North Dakota, with its extensive rural water supplies, large farming areas, and industrial sites, is not immune to this issue.
In April 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized new regulations addressing PFAS in drinking water. These regulations aim to reduce health risks associated with compounds that can persist indefinitely in the environment. At the same time, North Dakota agencies like the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) have been monitoring PFAS hotspots and exploring ways to support affected communities. I hope this overview helps you understand how these substances are entering North Dakota’s environment, what health impacts are linked to PFAS, and how you might protect yourself or pursue legal relief if you qualify.
PFAS in North Dakota’s drinking water
North Dakota’s drinking water primarily comes from surface water sources like the Missouri River or from groundwater pumped through municipal systems and private wells. Because PFAS chemicals can travel far from their original sources, they may appear even in remote areas. In April 2024, the EPA set new rules for PFAS levels in drinking water, putting greater responsibility on water utilities to test and limit contaminant levels. I want to explain some of the places in North Dakota where PFAS contamination has been observed and outline why these chemicals might end up in public and private water supplies.
Areas with known contamination
PFAS do not break down easily, which explains why they are detected in certain North Dakota water systems. Areas near industrial zones, agricultural research facilities, airports, or landfills may be particularly affected. According to the USGS, high human-impacted sites have a greater chance of PFAS detection in tap water. Although not every water supply in North Dakota shows elevated PFAS, ongoing testing programs aim to locate problem areas early.
Local institution-led studies have detected PFAS near specific facilities in western and eastern parts of the state. Additionally, proximity to the Great Lakes Basin or the Great Plains industrial corridors can increase the likelihood of PFAS appearing in local water sources, as these regions sometimes have greater historical usage of PFAS-containing products.
Common PFAS sources: AFFF, landfills, industry runoff
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam): Used to suppress large petroleum-based fires, particularly at airports and military installations. If not handled correctly, AFFF can seep into soil and water.
Landfills: Products coated in PFAS or containing PFAS can leak these chemicals into the surrounding environment as waste breaks down. Older landfill liners may not be equipped to filter out PFAS.
Industrial runoff: Factories that rely on water-resistant or nonstick technologies can discharge PFAS in wastewater. Industries may include metal plating, paper mills, or certain chemical manufacturing plants.
Testing data from North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality
The North Dakota DEQ collects data through monitoring programs that assess harmful substances, including PFAS, in public water systems. Testing results from 2022 and 2023 showed trace levels of PFAS chemicals in some municipal water supplies. While the detections did not always exceed the EPA’s interim health advisory levels, officials note that a single test may not capture long-term exposure risks.
Rural private wells are also of interest. Residents in outlying regions are encouraged to test their water if they suspect industrial or firefighting foam usage near their properties. Testing for PFAS usually requires specialized labs, and because the state’s programs are still expanding, well owners often shoulder the expense and logistics of sampling. The DEQ recommends that anyone relying on private wells consult qualified professionals to confirm the presence or absence of these contaminants.
PFAS in North Dakota’s soil and agriculture
North Dakota’s agriculture sector is a critical driver of the state’s economy. Unfortunately, PFAS chemicals are sometimes detected in the soil due to industrial spills, biosolid application on fields, landfill leachate, or irrigation water containing PFAS. These issues are not limited to urban areas. Rural communities and farmland can likewise be affected, threatening crop quality and overall food safety.
How PFAS reaches farmland in ND
I have found that PFAS migrates from multiple sources. For example, biosolids from municipal treatment plants sometimes contain trace amounts of PFAS, and they may be used as fertilizer. Industrial plants that release wastewater into local rivers or streams can also reach irrigation canals. Over time, repeated exposure can lead to accumulation in farmland soil.
Even regions considered low-impact—such as certain protected lands—are not entirely free of PFAS. Wind and water carry contaminants far from their initial release points. As a result, PFAS can build up in topsoil, root systems, and eventually in certain crops. This infiltration process underscores the need for broader statewide awareness and research.
Effects on crop safety and food supply
PFAS can attach to organic matter in soil, and certain plants may take up these compounds through root systems. Although the exact transport mechanisms differ based on soil composition and crop type, studies consistently show PFAS mobility in agricultural contexts. Farms that depend on groundwater wells for irrigation could face added risks if local aquifers are contaminated.
When PFAS is detected in produce or livestock feed, the health implications can extend throughout the food chain. The specific effects vary by PFAS type, but long-term exposures tend to raise concerns about liver health and immune responses in both humans and animals. As more data emerges, farmers may adopt more rigorous soil testing programs or shift irrigation water sources to minimize potential contamination.
Health effects of PFAS exposure
Major health agencies, including the EPA, warn that repeated PFAS exposure can disrupt various biological systems. Although it may take years for symptoms to appear, these chemicals accumulate gradually in the bloodstream. People exposed to high PFAS concentrations may develop issues like thyroid dysfunction, cholesterol imbalances, decreased vaccine response, and changes in liver enzymes.
Children and pregnant individuals may face higher risks, since developmental processes can be more sensitive to potential toxicants. While scientists continue to investigate the exact mechanism of harm, the correlation between PFAS levels in blood and certain chronic conditions warrants careful monitoring. Testing for PFAS in blood or urine is possible but not routinely performed. Guidelines vary, and clinicians often weigh multiple factors before recommending PFAS blood testing.
Diseases linked to PFAS in North Dakota
Researchers initially connected PFAS exposure to various illnesses through studies conducted on factory workers and communities residing near PFAS production plants. Over time, additional independent analyses confirmed that kidney and testicular cancer, thyroid disorders, and developmental problems are more likely to appear in populations with higher PFAS exposure.
Although every person’s biology differs, there is consistent evidence linking elevated PFAS levels in blood to health complications. North Dakota residents who live or work near known PFAS sources may be at greater risk. Below are a few conditions and symptoms that have been reported in PFAS-exposed populations.
Kidney and testicular cancer
PFAS are sometimes associated with certain cancers, notably kidney and testicular cancer. These findings emerged from epidemiological research in heavily contaminated communities, where PFAS concentrations in drinking water were quite high. While such cancers can arise from many risk factors, the presence of PFAS is considered one possible contributing factor. Anyone concerned about an increased cancer risk should coordinate with medical professionals for thorough evaluation and testing.
Thyroid disorders and liver damage
Thyroid function is essential to numerous bodily processes, from regulating metabolism to balancing hormone levels. PFAS exposure may result in subclinical or manifest thyroid disorders over time. According to various toxicity assessments, PFAS can also affect liver enzymes, sometimes increasing the likelihood of liver damage or fatty liver disease if exposure persists.
Developmental issues in children
Children are often more sensitive to environmental toxicants because their organs and immune systems are still developing. Studies have looked at the impact of PFAS on birth weight and neurodevelopment. While the scientific community continues to explore specifics, there is a shared emphasis on caution due to the chemicals’ capacity to accumulate in the body. Pregnant individuals living near PFAS hotspots should speak with healthcare providers about potential additional monitoring.
Immune and hormonal disruption
Some PFAS compounds can disrupt the body’s immune response, possibly reducing the effectiveness of vaccines. Additionally, certain PFAS chemicals are suspected of interfering with hormones that regulate growth and reproductive health. Ongoing research seeks to determine the thresholds beyond which these disruptions become clinically significant.
How is North Dakota responding to PFAS contamination?
North Dakota’s government agencies are expanding their knowledge base and response strategies for PFAS. The contaminants fall under broader Clean Water Act programs, which aim to maintain healthy waterways and protect public health. While PFAS regulation is still evolving, the state is increasingly working alongside federal partners to set guidelines on monitoring and remediation.
State and federal monitoring programs
The North Dakota DEQ incorporates PFAS considerations into existing water quality management frameworks. Officials identify impacted water bodies and develop strategies, often in concert with the TMDL Program. This program focuses on improving polluted waters by setting maximum permissible levels of pollutants. The Nonpoint Source Pollution Prevention Program also comes into play, aiming to reduce diffuse pollution from fields and unconfined sources.
Meanwhile, the EPA has released billions of dollars in infrastructure funding to states, earmarking resources to address “emerging contaminants” like PFAS. These funds support improved testing and water treatment technologies in small and rural communities, many of which face budget and resource constraints.
Public health advisories and local action
When PFAS levels surpass health advisories, state agencies issue alerts urging residents to limit exposure. In some communities, water systems may implement granular activated carbon or reverse osmosis treatments to remove PFAS from drinking water. Public outreach often includes recommendations to test private wells, especially for families or farmers living near airports, industrial corridors, or high-risk zones.
Local action can be as straightforward as upgrading water treatment plants or as complex as involving multiple stakeholders to coordinate long-term remediation efforts. Some residents in affected neighborhoods have joined community boards to push for faster cleanups. Others engage with environmental advocacy groups to petition for stricter regulations on PFAS usage and disposal.
Can you test your water or soil for PFAS in North Dakota?
If you rely on a private well or suspect that your municipal water might contain PFAS, testing is the most reliable way to confirm its presence. North Dakota’s DEQ website publishes guidelines on how to collect and ship samples to approved laboratories. Test kits often involve specially prepared containers and instructions to avoid contamination from household products that could contain PFAS.
Landowners interested in soil testing may consult an environmental engineering firm. Collecting multiple soil samples at varying depths can reveal whether PFAS is accumulating near the surface, in deeper strata, or both. Because these tests can be costly, it is wise to contact local authorities first to see if any state-sponsored grants or the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funds might offset some of the expenses.
Do you qualify for a PFAS lawsuit in North Dakota?
Legal claims over PFAS contamination are on the rise nationwide, including in North Dakota. You may qualify for a lawsuit if you can demonstrate prolonged exposure to PFAS in your water, soil, or workplace and document related health issues. This may include cancers, thyroid problems, or other diseases scientifically linked to PFAS. Residential communities near known PFAS sources often file class-action suits when multiple people share similar exposures.
I encourage you to gather medical records, water test results, soil analyses, or any local advisories indicating above-average PFAS detections. Even if your community is not currently part of a class-action lawsuit, you can still consult with an attorney to discuss individual or group claims. Law firms specializing in environmental toxic torts frequently handle PFAS cases, and early engagement can be vital, given the complexity of proving exposure and negotiating settlements.
Why choose Legal Claim Assistant
I know it can be difficult to find legal support if you suspect your health was harmed by PFAS. That is where Legal Claim Assistant can help. Their platform offers free case reviews and connects you with experienced attorneys in the field of PFAS litigation. Whether you have questions about your eligibility or the strength of your case, they can guide you through the initial steps, preserving your right to compensation.
Legal Claim Assistant has extensive resources you can review to learn how PFAS contamination cases proceed in court. If you want more details on PFAS lawsuits, take a look at:
They stay current with federal regulations and pending class-action suits, so you have up-to-date information on filing deadlines, potential settlements, and emerging scientific evidence.
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
I often hear questions about PFAS, testing methods, symptoms, and the legal process. Here are some of the most common ones that North Dakota residents ask.
PFAS in North Carolina’s Drinking Water
I know how important it is to trust that the water flowing from my tap is safe. However, many public water systems in North Carolina have discovered levels of PFAS—particularly compounds like PFOA, PFOS, and GenX—well above proposed or newly finalized Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs). Because most municipal treatment plants were not originally designed to remove PFAS, these chemicals can pass through filtration and end up in household faucets.
In April 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced final drinking water standards—legally enforceable MCLs—for six PFAS compounds. Public water systems have five years to meet these new standards, though state officials encourage immediate action. DEQ testing in 2022 and 2023 has confirmed that multiple municipal systems have PFOA or PFOS levels higher than what the EPA now deems safe (4 parts per trillion).
Cape Fear River Basin Contamination
The Cape Fear River system has been a focal point for PFAS contamination since about 2016, when researchers discovered elevated levels of GenX, a PFAS substitute, in the river. According to the NCDEQ, industries along the river have historically discharged PFAS-laden wastewater or air emissions that eventually settled into surface water. The Cape Fear River forms an important drinking water source for many counties and provides irrigation for farmland, placing a wide population at risk of exposure.
GenX and Chemours Facility in Fayetteville
One of the most prominent industrial sources of PFAS in the region is the Chemours facility in Fayetteville, which was previously part of DuPont. Chemours manufactured GenX and related compounds, leading to significant environmental discharges. Testing in Robeson County, which is served by the Robeson County Water System, revealed GenX concentrations as high as 33 parts per trillion—beyond the new federal threshold of 10 parts per trillion for GenX set by the EPA in 2024. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing testing and remediation efforts to protect local drinking water.
Affected Counties and Municipalities
Besides communities near the Cape Fear River, DEQ sampling shows PFAS levels above or near proposed federal limits in multiple county water systems across the state. In 2022, DEQ conducted three months of sampling at 50 municipal and county water systems identified in a prior PFAS Testing Network study. Of these, 42 were found to have certain PFAS compounds exceeding then-draft MCLs.
Looking to expand data collection, DEQ is sampling 655 smaller systems, including schools and daycares. These results allow officials to map contamination more accurately and offer solutions tailored to each system’s population and budget. For residents whose private wells test above recommended health advisory levels, a DEQ pilot program now provides funds for in-home filtration through the Bernard Allen Emergency Drinking Water Fund.
PFAS in North Carolina’s Soil and Agriculture
PFAS contamination does not stop at the water supply; these substances are also detected in soil. Because PFAS are resistant to breakdown, water used for crop irrigation may transfer PFAS into fields, which can accumulate in produce or livestock feed. According to environmental scientists in North Carolina, the cumulative effect of PFAS in soil poses a risk for farms that rely on local wells or surface water for irrigation.
Farmers in North Carolina may face:
Reduced consumer confidence in local produce if contamination is detected.
Uncertainty over how to remediate PFAS in soil.
Potential livestock exposure from contaminated groundwater.
As state agencies and universities continue to study PFAS’s effects on agriculture, farmers and consumers gain a better understanding of long-term risks. However, mitigation can be complicated, and many growers rely on water sampling and laboratory tests to verify PFAS levels in their soil.
Health Effects of PFAS Exposure
I recognize the worry many North Carolinians feel when they learn their water or surroundings may contain PFAS. Scientific literature, including research from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), has documented links between PFAS exposure and a range of health problems, though severity can vary depending on dose and duration of exposure. Some commonly referenced concerns include:
Immune system effects, such as reduced antibody production in response to vaccines.
Hormonal disruptions, particularly related to thyroid function.
Elevated cholesterol or other metabolic changes.
Liver damage, which can impair the body’s ability to process toxins.
Because PFAS do not degrade quickly, repeated exposure can lead to higher concentrations in blood and tissues over time. Children, pregnant women, and individuals with existing health conditions may be especially vulnerable. If you suspect you have experienced PFAS exposure, discussing potential medical testing with a healthcare provider can offer further guidance.
PFAS-Linked Diseases in North Carolina
Although the science on PFAS is still evolving, studies already link certain PFAS forms—like PFOA and PFOS—to multiple illnesses. In North Carolina, health agencies and research partners are examining how local PFAS levels might correlate with observed health trends. Data from national and state health studies suggest the following diseases appear more frequently after long-term, high-level PFAS exposure.
Kidney Cancer
Kidney cancer is one of the malignancies most consistently associated with PFAS exposure, especially PFOA. Investigators note that repeated consumption of contaminated water may raise the risk, although multiple factors (including genetics and lifestyle) also play a role. North Carolina’s Department of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS) encourages individuals with known PFAS exposure to share their history with medical professionals, who can consider additional screening if appropriate.
Testicular Cancer
Testicular cancer has likewise been linked to PFAS in several population studies. Research indicates that PFAS might disrupt hormone regulation, potentially contributing to abnormal cell growth. While the relative risk increase is considered moderate, it warrants further investigation, and those who live near documented PFAS hotspots should remain attentive to any unusual symptoms.
Thyroid Disease
The thyroid gland produces hormones essential for metabolism and normal growth. PFAS compounds have been shown to interfere with thyroid hormone levels, possibly leading to hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism. In North Carolina, individuals with higher PFAS exposure may experience more frequent thyroid function irregularities, prompting doctors to recommend routine checks on thyroid hormone levels.
Liver Damage and Cholesterol Changes
Researchers have found that PFAS exposure can worsen liver enzyme profiles, highlighting a potential strain on this vital organ. Higher LDL (“bad”) cholesterol levels are also reported in some communities where PFAS contamination is prevalent. Both conditions may develop gradually, and many people do not realize they are at risk until they undergo blood tests or experience noticeable symptoms.
How North Carolina Is Responding to the PFAS Crisis
I have seen North Carolina respond with policy changes, new sampling efforts, and legal enforcement to address the PFAS crisis. The state aims to protect citizens from ongoing contamination, hold polluters accountable for past releases, and ensure that municipalities and smaller systems have the resources they need to treat or filter PFAS-contaminated water.
NC Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Actions
The NCDEQ issued its “Action Strategy for PFAS” in June 2022, prioritizing:
Protection of communities most at risk.
Safeguarding drinking water supplies.
Cleaning up existing contamination with an emphasis on the “polluter pays” principle.
As part of this plan, DEQ launched a pilot program through the Bernard Allen Emergency Drinking Water Fund to install treatment systems in private wells that exceed health advisory levels. In 2022, DEQ conducted three months of sampling at 50 municipal and county water systems, discovering widespread PFAS detections. According to DEQ, 42 systems had PFOA or PFOS above the proposed federal standards. DEQ is now extending sampling to 655 small systems, including schools and daycares.
With support from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, North Carolina is developing statewide treatment solutions. The Environmental Management Commission has also moved forward on groundwater standards, approving interim maximum allowable concentrations (IMACs) for multiple PFAS in October 2024.
Legal Settlements and Enforcements
Beyond testing, the state has taken legal actions to reduce further discharges. Chemours, formerly part of DuPont, entered into agreements aimed at curbing PFAS emissions from its Fayetteville facility. The company must also finance remediation initiatives and monitoring programs. These settlements serve as a warning to other industrial polluters that discharging PFAS compounds without adequate controls will face regulatory scrutiny.
Community Health Outreach and Testing
NCDHHS and local health departments partner on community outreach to keep residents informed about PFAS risks and testing opportunities. Some counties offer free water sampling for households near suspected contamination zones. In cases where no responsible party provides alternative water, the Bernard Allen Fund can help eligible residents install in-home filtration systems. This network of state and local resources aims to ensure people know how to test their water, interpret the results, and seek medical or legal help if needed.
Can You Test Your Water or Soil for PFAS in North Carolina?
Yes. Several state-certified laboratories in North Carolina can test for PFAS, but the process often requires specialized methods. When you contact a lab, ask if it can detect PFAS at very low concentrations (parts per trillion). The DEQ website lists labs qualified to perform these analyses, and local health departments may help you understand any results.
For private wells, the DEQ’s pilot program or the Bernard Allen Emergency Drinking Water Fund can provide financial support if your contamination level meets or exceeds health advisory standards. A successful test will:
Identify which specific PFAS compounds are present.
Measure them against EPA or state advisory levels.
Inform a decision on the best type of filtration or whether to switch to an alternate water source.
For soil testing, you can contact university extension programs or environmental consulting firms that have experience handling PFAS. Because agriculture might be affected, farmers particularly benefit from periodic testing of both soil and irrigation water to keep contamination in check.
Do You Qualify for a PFAS Lawsuit in North Carolina?
If you have experienced exposure to PFAS in drinking water, soil, or from industrial emissions—and have suffered subsequent injuries or health problems—you may qualify to file a PFAS lawsuit in North Carolina. Qualifying factors often include:
Documented PFAS levels above regulatory limits in your water supply.
A medical diagnosis linked to PFAS exposure, such as kidney or testicular cancer.
Financial or health impacts that raise legal claims against suspected polluters.
Some PFAS lawsuits target manufacturers or industrial facilities that knowingly released PFAS without adequately warning or protecting local communities. Others seek compensation for costs related to water treatment, well remediation, or personal injury from PFAS-related diseases. Determining if you qualify often involves gathering test results, medical records, and expert opinions linking contamination to potential harm.
If your PFAS exposure has led to serious health consequences, you might consider exploring the nationwide PFAS litigation involving companies like DuPont or Chemours. To find out if your circumstances meet the legal criteria for a claim, you can consult resources at:
Why Choose Legal Claim Assistant
When I discovered the scope of PFAS contamination in our state, I wanted a reliable way to connect with legal professionals who understand the complexities of PFAS litigation. Legal Claim Assistant provides that link. By choosing their services:
You receive a free review of your case to see if you meet criteria for legal claims.
You connect with experienced lawyers familiar with PFAS and environmental claims.
You spare yourself the research of finding attorneys on your own—Legal Claim Assistant does the vetting process.
You gain a better chance of a favorable outcome with professionals who help gather evidence and build a strong case.
Through in-depth knowledge of PFAS science, state regulations, and past settlements, Legal Claim Assistant can help you navigate everything from preliminary testing to formal filings. If you suspect a link between your health concerns and PFAS exposure, their free consultation offers clarity.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Not everyone has the same experience with PFAS, and I often hear specific questions from friends and neighbors who worry about their water or health. Below are some of the most common queries.
PFAS can be found in industrial zones, near airports where AFFF was used, and in farmland that may have received wastewater or biosolid applications. Municipal testing in cities like Bismarck and Fargo has measured low to moderate PFAS levels. Many areas in rural North Dakota also show trace amounts, though contamination there often depends on local waste sites or industrial activities.
Yes. You can engage a state-certified laboratory that offers PFAS testing kits for both municipal tap water and private wells. North Dakota’s DEQ provides a list of recommended labs. Carefully follow all instructions. If you have a private well, consider periodic testing, particularly if you live near potential contamination sources.
If you live outside New Jersey but worry about similar contamination, you can learn about other states’ PFAS issues, such as in Minnesota and Michigan.
Elevated PFAS exposure has been linked to kidney and testicular cancers, thyroid disorders, and liver damage. It can also affect development in children and potentially disrupt the immune system. The degree of risk varies by individual, but I recommend contacting a healthcare professional if you suspect PFAS exposure and experience related symptoms.
If you believe PFAS contamination harmed your health or property value, you may have the right to pursue compensation. Litigation options in North Dakota include joining a class-action lawsuit or filing an individual personal injury or property damage claim. Consult an attorney who has handled PFAS cases to evaluate the merits and gather proof of exposure.
Begin by collecting evidence: water or soil test results, documentation of known PFAS sources near you, and medical records that confirm related illnesses. Next, speak with a lawyer skilled in environmental or toxic tort law. A free case review through Legal Claim Assistant can match you with a professional who will guide you on filing deadlines, negotiating with potentially liable parties, and estimating potential damages.
Overview PFAS contamination in the USA
Here you van find the PFAS watercontamination map of the United States. Find, state by state, where water contamination has occurred due to PFAS exposure.
- PFAS in Alabama
- PFAS in Alaska
- PFAS in Arizona
- PFAS in Arkansas
- PFAS in California
- PFAS in Colorado
- PFAS in Connecticut
- PFAS in Delaware
- PFAS in Florida
- PFAS in Georgia
- PFAS in Hawai
- PFAS in Idaho
- PFAS in Illinois
- PFAS in Indiana
- PFAS in Iowa
- PFAS in Kansas
- PFAS in Kentucky
- PFAS in Louisiana
- PFAS in Maine
- PFAS in Maryland
- PFAS in Massachusetts
- PFAS in Michigan
- PFAS in Minnesota
- PFAS in Mississippi
- PFAS in Missouri
- PFAS in Montana
- PFAS in Nebraska
- PFAS in Nevada
- PFAS in New Hampshire
- PFAS in New Jersey
- PFAS in New Mexico
- PFAS in New York
- PFAS in North Carolina
- PFAS in North Dakota
- PFAS in Ohio
- PFAS in Oklahoma
- PFAS in Oregon
- PFAS in Pennsylvania
- PFAS in Rhode Island
- PFAS in South Carolina
- PFAS in South Dakota
- PFAS in Tennessee
- PFAS in Texas
- PFAS in Utah
- PFAS in Vermont
- PFAS in Virginia
- PFAS in Washington
- PFAS in West Virginia
- PFAS in Wisconsin
- PFAS in Wyoming
Related Article
What Philips CPAP Machines Are Recalled and Why
