PFAS in Utah

  • Last updated: July 16, 2025
PFAS in Utah
Source: https://www.ewg.org/interactive-maps/pfas_contamination/map/

I have spent the past several months examining how perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly known as PFAS, affect Utah communities. PFAS are sometimes called “forever chemicals” because they break down very slowly in the environment and can benefit or harm people depending on their concentration and use. For many residents, concerns center on how PFAS might contaminate drinking water, lead to health risks like kidney and testicular cancer, and disrupt local agriculture.

PFAS Utah stories generally begin with reports of firefighting foam, industrial waste, and pesticides that introduce these chemicals to the soil and water. Researchers, including those at the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), have found evidence of PFAS in wells around Salt Lake City and Park City, prompting fresh questions about water quality. In my view, the topic is critical for anyone who calls Utah home, particularly if they have faced health impacts they suspect are linked to PFAS contamination.

Do I Qualify?
Table of Contents:

PFAS in Utah’s Drinking Water

From my research, drinking water remains one of the top concerns for Utahns, given the potential for direct, daily exposure through the tap. In the past few years, the EPA introduced regulations that require water systems to measure their PFAS concentrations and, when necessary, begin remediation. The DEQ has formed a specialized team to track detection and contamination trends across the state’s drinking water sources.

Confirmed Water System Contamination

Early in 2024, the DEQ flagged test results from two Salt Lake City wells and portions of Park City’s drinking water supply. Both locations reported PFAS levels that surpass new EPA health advisories for PFOA and PFOS, two prominent PFAS variants. Although these levels do not necessarily pose an immediate, acute risk, health experts stress that consistent exposure elevates the chance of long-term problems like kidney and testicular cancer.

Based on the DEQ’s preliminary data, the contamination is localized rather than widespread. Even so, officials recommend that all public water systems remain vigilant. I have seen that many smaller municipalities are particularly concerned about monitoring costs. Facilities in disadvantaged communities often need more funding to conduct regular testing and install treatment systems.

Primary Sources: Firefighting Foam, Industrial Waste, Military Activities

One major PFAS contributor in Utah is aqueous film forming foam (AFFF), used historically for firefighting drills at airports and military installations. This foam can seep into the ground, carrying PFAS well beyond the training zone. In industrial areas, plastics and chemical manufacturing may also release PFAS into local wastewater.

Military sites have long been under scrutiny, especially since many rely on large-scale firefighting exercises. Over time, PFAS-laced water can migrate into adjacent aquifers, posing a risk to nearby private wells. According to the Utah DEQ, areas around Hill Air Force Base and Tooele Army Depot have been included in PFAS assessment efforts. The results so far vary, but continued testing is planned in coordination with federal agencies.

Data from the EPA and Utah Department of Environmental Quality

EPA data shows that between 6% and 10% of all regulated public water systems nationwide could exceed newly tightened maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for PFAS. Utah’s water providers are bound by the same regulations, and many have already started frequent sampling. Public systems that exceed MCLs must notify communities, reduce PFAS contamination, and repeat testing until they are consistently under the regulatory limit.

The Utah DEQ has pledged it will share detailed monitoring results with local governments and communities once laboratory analyses confirm contamination. Additionally, the state is taking advantage of nearly 1 billion USD in federal funds, allocated via the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), to help water facilities address PFAS and other emerging contaminants. In my assessment, these measures can accelerate remediation where resources are scarce.

PFAS in Utah’s Soil and Agriculture

Although water contamination often leads the conversation, I have also reviewed how PFAS might infiltrate Utah’s soil and agricultural lands. Some farmland relies on irrigation water drawn from watersheds that could contain small amounts of PFAS. Over time, these chemicals may bind to soil particles and potentially filter into crops.

Risk to Farmland, Crops, and Food Safety

Farmers in Utah frequently use biosolids—treated sewage sludge—as well as compost and other soil amendments to enrich the land. According to emerging research, PFAS have been found in some biosolids outside the state. Prolonged application on fields can allow PFAS to accumulate and potentially migrate into plants grown for human or livestock consumption.

A central concern remains how these chemicals can affect the food chain. Even if water or soil PFAS levels are moderate, certain crops might bioaccumulate PFAS in their roots or leaves. Meat and dairy from animals fed contaminated feed could also carry trace levels. While current Utah data suggests that localized contamination, where it exists, remains below critical thresholds, the DEQ acknowledges that more thorough monitoring is still underway.

PFAS in Biosolids and Soil Testing Programs

In spring 2019, the Utah DEQ formed a PFAS Workgroup that collaborates with water and waste experts. Part of its mission is to organize soil testing programs. The Workgroup has investigated possible biosolid applications, tracking how PFAS might travel from wastewater treatment plants to farms. So far, research on Utah farmland remains limited, but agencies plan broader sampling.

I noticed that local authorities emphasize caution until more concrete data is developed. In the meantime, they advise farmers to adopt best practices, such as verifying the sources of soil amendments, testing water used for irrigation, and reporting unusual test results for follow-up investigations.

Health Effects of PFAS Exposure

When I look at scientific literature, the health considerations for PFAS extend well beyond short-term irritations. Long-term exposure at even low concentrations has been associated with:

  • Increased cholesterol levels

  • Immune-system disruption

  • Possible effects on reproductive health and fertility

  • Worsening of thyroid conditions

  • Elevated risks of liver damage and certain cancers

According to the CDC, PFAS exposure can happen through multiple daily activities: drinking water, ingesting contaminated food, or inhaling dust particles from household products. In Utah, the main exposure pathways appear tied to water contamination, especially in communities served by impacted wells. Although ongoing research aims to clarify the exact mechanisms, the CDC issued a health alert in January 2024 emphasizing heightened kidney-cancer risks.

Diseases Linked to PFAS in Utah

While PFAS may have a variety of health consequences, certain conditions have drawn special attention in Utah. Kidney cancer, testicular cancer, liver damage, thyroid disorders, and immune dysfunction are among the illnesses that health authorities link to prolonged exposure. Although I believe more research is needed, these patterns align with national and international studies.

Kidney Cancer

Kidney cancer has been a particular concern, highlighted by both the Utah DEQ and the CDC. The compound perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a subset of PFAS, is often implicated in kidney-cancer risk. One possibility is that PFOA can interfere with kidney-cell regeneration, spurring the growth of malignant cells. For older adults in Utah, the disease appears at higher rates in men than women, raising questions about potential occupational exposures in industries that handle PFAS.

Testicular Cancer

Areas near old military installations show elevated levels of PFAS, raising fears about testicular cancer. Younger men, typically between 20 and 34, account for most testicular-cancer diagnoses. Health experts attribute at least part of the risk to repeated contact with PFAS-laden water or soil and to firefighting foam used during training exercises. State health data indicates that even small concentrations of PFAS in water supplies could contribute to higher numbers of cases.

Liver Damage

Liver toxicity is another key concern. Data suggests that repeated exposure can lead to a buildup of PFAS in liver tissue, potentially causing inflammation and damaging the organ’s ability to detoxify the blood. In experimental studies outside Utah, researchers found that PFAS may disrupt bile-acid pathways and lipid metabolism, issues that can worsen over time. Although less high-profile than cancer, liver harm affects overall health and can lead to chronic conditions.

Thyroid Disorders

In my view, thyroid disruption often goes overlooked. PFAS can affect how thyroid hormones are produced and regulated. When those hormones are imbalanced, individuals may experience fatigue, unexpected weight changes, or other metabolic problems. According to the National Toxicology Program’s references (mentioned in broader PFAS studies), consistent exposure to PFAS can exacerbate hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, both of which may already be relatively common in certain populations.

Immune Dysfunction and Birth Defects

Immunological studies of PFAS show links to suppressed antibody responses and heightened auto-immune reactions, including conditions such as ulcerative colitis. In Utah, some have raised concerns that pregnant women and children under five might be more vulnerable to these effects. Prolonged PFAS exposure during early development could potentially alter immune programming, leading to higher risks of certain birth defects or long-term health complications.

How Is Utah Responding to PFAS Contamination?

Multiple agencies and community groups are working with federal partners to address PFAS contamination across Utah. These initiatives include testing public water supplies, raising awareness, and pursuing funding to upgrade filtration technologies. In many cases, the state’s approach involves adapting to new rules from the EPA, which finalized stricter PFAS standards in April 2024.

Utah DEQ Actions and Investigations

The Utah DEQ coordinates the PFAS Workgroup, which began a Reconnaissance Plan in 2019. This plan targets drinking water wells, fish and waterfowl tissue analysis, and wastewater sources to identify baseline PFAS levels. The DEQ says it will continue gathering public feedback on local contamination, particularly in areas near industrial sites or military bases. Although some results show only trace contaminants, higher readings in Salt Lake City and Park City spurred immediate mitigation steps.

Federal Support and Regulations

To me, the newly finalized EPA regulations are central to Utah’s response. The enforceable MCLs are set at 4 parts per trillion for PFOA and PFOS, with 10 parts per trillion for another four PFAS chemicals. Public water systems must test regularly under these standards and inform residents if PFAS levels exceed the maximums. Systems that fall out of compliance have three years to implement solutions, such as installing specialized filters or blending water from different sources.

Federal programs also offer financial assistance. The EPA’s announced plan channels close to 1 billion USD to help pay for PFAS remediation and monitoring, particularly for smaller or disadvantaged communities. I noticed that local municipalities often cite funding as their primary barrier to consistent testing.

Local Government and Community-Based Efforts

City and county governments are teaming up with citizen groups to increase outreach. These coalitions educate residents on best practices, such as how to filter drinking water at home or check local water reports. Some environmental nonprofits—like Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment—are also lobbying state officials to enforce stricter pesticide regulations, calling for a ban on pesticide products that contain PFAS.

Initiatives in Park City and Salt Lake City include designing advanced water treatment stations capable of removing PFAS. Local leaders consider these investments necessary to comply with the new MCLs and safeguard the region’s reputation as a family-friendly tourist destination. Banning PFAS-based ski waxes is another example of a community-driven action that underscores the wide-reaching impact of these chemicals.

Can You Test Your Water or Soil for PFAS in Utah?

Over the course of my research, I discovered that private labs offer PFAS testing to individuals who suspect contamination at home. The challenge is cost. Analyses can run from a few hundred to over a thousand dollars, depending on how many PFAS variants are tested. Utah’s DEQ sometimes coordinates free or reduced-cost testing for households in high-risk zones, although enrollment in these programs is typically limited.

For homeowners, the first step is to contact the local water utility. If the system reports compliance with EPA standards but you still want independent confirmation, requesting a test kit from a certified lab remains an option. Meanwhile, farmers or landowners looking to test soil or irrigation water can consult the DEQ or hire private environmental firms with specialized sampling protocols. Proper sampling is crucial. PFAS can bind to containers or lab equipment, potentially leading to inaccurate results if procedures are not followed precisely.

Do You Qualify for a PFAS Lawsuit in Utah?

I often receive questions about legal options. In general, you may qualify for a PFAS lawsuit if you have faced illness or property damage linked to confirmed PFAS contamination. If you suspect your water source tested above regulatory thresholds for PFAS, or you have health records that point to conditions correlated with such exposure, you might be eligible.

Establishing legal cases for PFAS can be complex. Attorneys usually gather medical and environmental evidence, such as blood-test results or water-sample data, to demonstrate causation. For more information, I recommend reading about potential claims on the Legal Claim Assistant’s PFAS Lawsuit page. This resource explains key factors, including how lawyers evaluate your scenario, whether you need medical records, and what compensation might be possible.

Why Choose Legal Claim Assistant

When I look at the landscape of PFAS litigation, finding a reliable, fact-oriented legal partner is critical. Legal Claim Assistant connects individuals with attorneys experienced in PFAS claims. In my experience, these legal teams can help investigate contamination sources, align you with medical experts who understand PFAS illnesses, and determine if your situation meets the threshold for filing a lawsuit.

I appreciate that Legal Claim Assistant focuses on making the process straightforward. Its website details common scenarios in which PFAS contamination leads to illnesses or property-loss claims. You can discover more about broader water contamination lawsuits at this dedicated page or look into cases involving manufacturers like DuPont at their DuPont Lawsuit information. While no outcome is guaranteed, organizations that specialize in PFAS claims typically have the expertise to navigate state and federal regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

People often send me questions about PFAS contamination in Utah, and I have compiled some of the most common inquiries. Consulting with professionals—scientific experts, healthcare providers, and legal advisors—can also help you make informed decisions if PFAS contamination has impacted your life.

Find out if you're eligible and may be eligible for compensation.
Get your Free Case Review and Maximize You Payout With the Help From Legal Claim Assistant.
Get A Free Case Review
Free

PFAS in Texas Drinking Water

Drinking water remains one of the most critical pathways for PFAS exposure. When PFAS contaminants enter the water supply, they can migrate efficiently and reach large populations. In Texas, tests have shown that some public water systems already exceed new EPA limits for certain PFAS chemicals. These findings have led to growing public pressure for stricter monitoring and prompt remediation.

Affected Regions and Municipalities

Recent data submitted to the EPA indicate that 49 public water utility systems across Texas have reported surpassing the EPA’s new limits for five “forever chemicals.” Fort Worth’s water system, serving roughly 1.3 million people, recorded PFHxS concentrations ranging from 12.2 to 25.8 parts per trillion, well above the federal limit of 10 parts per trillion specified by the EPA. While the identified exceedances are spread across the state, highly urbanized and industrialized areas tend to show elevated PFAS levels more frequently.

For context, the American Water Works Association estimates that reducing PFAS like PFOA and PFOS to meet federal standards could cost U.S. utilities more than 3.8 billion USD per year. Even smaller municipalities in Texas face significant expenses to upgrade their water treatment facilities or to source water from alternative, PFAS-free locations.

Testing Efforts and Advisory Levels

Under new EPA rules, large public water systems must conduct thorough PFAS testing within three years. The goal is to measure contaminants in influent, effluent, and sewage sludge. Results can guide authorities in deciding whether water systems need advanced filtration, such as activated carbon, reverse osmosis, or ion exchange. These treatments often remove PFAS but can strain local budgets.

In March 2023, the EPA also set legally enforceable limits for PFOA and PFOS at 4 parts per trillion, and for PFHxS, PFNA, and HFPO-DA at 10 parts per trillion. Water utilities that fail to meet these standards after five years may face penalties and must develop remediation strategies to protect public health.

Ongoing Contamination from AFFF Firefighting Foam

AFFF firefighting foam is one of the most cited sources of PFAS contamination. Firefighters and facility managers have used this foam for decades to extinguish petroleum-based fires. While acknowledged as highly effective, AFFF can seep into nearby water sources if spills or runoff are not contained. In Texas, this issue arises in and around airfields, refineries, and military installations. The EPA’s Publicly Owned Treatment Works Influent PFAS Study is gathering data on how AFFF and other industrial discharges affect local wastewater facilities.

Because AFFF usage has spanned many years, historical contamination can linger even if a site no longer actively uses these products. I have seen many communities sent scrambling to test for and remediate PFAS in private wells that sit near old training or crash sites. This typically entails advanced filtration systems in homes and stricter regulation of industrial sites that still store or use firefighting foam.

PFAS in Texas Soil and Agriculture

PFAS do not only threaten water supplies. They can also accumulate in soil, which in turn affects crops, livestock, and eventually the human food chain. In many parts of Texas, agriculture drives local economies, and farmers must remain vigilant about potential contamination. Areas prone to wastewater runoff or historical usage of AFFF face higher soil-PFAS levels. Some producers have considered switching to new land-management practices that minimize PFAS transfers from soil to plants and livestock.

Although research into PFAS uptake by crops is ongoing, early findings suggest that plants can absorb these chemicals at varying levels. When that occurs, exposures can continue even after water systems have been filtered. Regions with PFAS-impacted soil often call on state agencies like TCEQ to conduct robust testing so farmers have reliable information when making land-use decisions.

Health Effects of PFAS Exposure

Health risks linked to PFAS include cancer, fertility issues, high cholesterol, and compromised immune responses. In 2022, the EPA issued health advisories touching on these potential impacts. PFAS exposure can happen through multiple pathways: drinking water, eating contaminated produce, inhaling air near industrial operations, or using consumer products manufactured with PFAS.

The U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry found that PFAS levels can build up over time, leading to more pronounced effects as individuals age or encounter multiple sources of contamination. Some workers, specifically firefighters and ski wax technicians, face high levels of on-the-job exposure. Children and pregnant individuals may be at heightened risk, since PFAS can affect development and lead to low birth weights. Research is ongoing to clarify these links and understand potential long-term effects on entire communities.

PFAS-Linked Diseases in Texas

In Texas, certain diseases have gained attention because they appear more frequently in populations heavily exposed to PFAS. While research on causation is ongoing, multiple studies suggest these chemicals may be risk factors for kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, and liver-related ailments. Below is a closer look at each concern.

Kidney Cancer

Kidney cancer risk has been associated with PFAS for nearly a decade. Laboratory and epidemiological studies show that accumulations of PFOA and PFOS in the body can lead to kidney cell damage. In Texas, the concern is that chronic exposure via drinking water, soil, or contaminated food might compound an individual’s lifelong risk. The American Cancer Society urges additional screening and emphasizes that anyone with known PFAS exposure, along with other risk factors, repeatedly consult healthcare providers about potential symptoms.

Testicular Cancer

Testicular cancer is another area under scrutiny. Several epidemiological studies document higher rates of the disease in communities near PFAS manufacturing or disposal sites. In Lubbock County, for instance, PFHxS and PFOA were detected in participants’ blood at levels higher than the national average, leading researchers to question whether specific cancers might have increased over time. While not every PFAS-exposed individual develops cancer, monitoring trends is crucial for early detection.

Thyroid Disease

Thyroid disorders, including hypothyroidism, can be linked to PFAS because of how these chemicals interact with the endocrine system. Texas residents in certain industrial hubs have reported thyroid disease that healthcare providers are tracking alongside PFAS data. Symptoms such as unexplained weight fluctuation or changes in metabolism can prompt doctors to test for thyroid problems. If results reveal a link, public health officials typically champion more vigorous testing of local water and soil to halt further exposure.

Liver Damage and Cholesterol Changes

Liver toxicity and elevated cholesterol are among the more widely recognized problems linked to PFAS. According to the National Institutes of Health, chronic exposure can inflame the liver and disrupt normal metabolic pathways. In Texas communities with known contamination, individuals might experience persistent fatigue, abdominal discomfort, or elevated cholesterol that resists standard treatments. These warning signs often prompt more comprehensive medical evaluations and might point back to PFAS as a contributing factor.

How Texas Is Responding to PFAS Contamination

State and federal agencies in Texas recognize the urgency of PFAS contamination. Still, the path toward comprehensive regulation involves a range of stakeholders, including the EPA, TCEQ, local governments, and water utilities. The complexity of PFAS—over 12,000 chemicals in the group—makes regulation and remediation a long-term challenge.

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Actions

TCEQ has ramped up testing of public water supplies and has begun advising municipalities on treatment options. Beyond water quality standards, officials also explore soil testing in places where industrial or firefighting foam usage is widespread. TCEQ’s broader initiatives often rely on voluntary compliance from local industries, but the agency can enforce cleanup under Texas state law if a site poses imminent public health threats.

At the moment, TCEQ is collaborating with federal partners to ensure new Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) regulations for PFAS are harmonized in Texas. While the EPA is expected to fully implement its rules in the next few years, TCEQ is also addressing site-specific cleanups, aiming to reduce PFAS levels in particularly vulnerable or historically neglected areas.

Collaboration with the EPA

Texas stands to benefit from nationwide studies and regulatory frameworks, such as the EPA’s Publicly Owned Treatment Works Influent PFAS Study. Under this plan, large wastewater treatment facilities complete questionnaires and collect samples of influent, effluent, and sludge. These data points allow the EPA to map industrial PFAS discharges. It also sets the groundwork for mandated PFAS disposal measures, monitoring requirements, and user restrictions in 2025.

In addition, Texas water systems must meet new federal PFAS limits within five years. This synchronization means local utilities need to invest in technologies—like nanofiltration or granular activated carbon—that can effectively remove PFAS. However, installing such systems comes at significant financial cost, raising concerns that some smaller municipalities or rural areas might struggle to comply.

Challenges in Rural and Private Water Systems

Rural communities face unique hurdles. Private wells often serve as the primary water source, but rural areas do not always have the funding or expertise to perform rigorous PFAS testing. Residents might not even know they should test for PFAS until someone experiences a health complication. Meanwhile, local health departments can be limited in resources and staff.

Past examples include Lubbock County, where PFAS contamination in private wells prompted the U.S. Air Force to install whole-house treatment systems. This scenario illustrates that localized efforts can succeed—but only after issues surface through community reports or targeted studies. Going forward, I see a pressing need for broader outreach, so residents across Texas understand when and how to test for potential contamination.

Can You Test Your Water or Soil for PFAS in Texas?

If you worry your water or soil might contain PFAS, several testing options exist. Homeowners can hire state-certified laboratories to analyze well water or garden soil. The EPA suggests using methods specifically validated for PFAS detection, as standard tests may not accurately measure contamination at the parts-per-trillion level. You can often find reputable labs by contacting TCEQ or checking the EPA’s recommended list of certified facilities.

For added peace of mind, some homeowners install water filters designed to remove PFAS. Filters that use activated carbon or reverse osmosis typically work well, but you should confirm that your filter is certified to remove PFAS. If your tests confirm high PFAS levels, you might consider bottled or alternative water sources until a permanent solution is in place. This can help reduce your exposure and lower potential health risks.

Do You Qualify for a PFAS Lawsuit in Texas?

If you believe that PFAS in your drinking water or soil has harmed you, you may wish to seek legal advice. PFAS-related lawsuits often revolve around product liability, contamination negligence, and failure to warn communities of chemical risks. Many states, Texas included, have launched lawsuits against manufacturers or major polluters for widespread PFAS contamination. As of December 2024, the Attorneys General of 30 states and DC have initiated litigation against PFAS manufacturers.

Whether you qualify for a PFAS lawsuit depends on factors like where you live, how you were exposed, and whether you’ve suffered any medical effects tied to PFAS. Employers who expose workers to PFAS without adequate protective measures might also be liable under Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) rules. Because these cases can involve complex scientific and legal arguments, consulting a professional to evaluate your circumstances is recommended.

Why Choose Legal Claim Assistant

I have found that navigating PFAS litigation can be daunting, especially when large chemical manufacturers or multiple government agencies are involved. This is where Legal Claim Assistant can help. Their platform connects you with law firms experienced in PFAS cases, so you can explore free case reviews without worrying about finding qualified counsel on your own. It is an approach that prioritizes timely connections and clear communication.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Below, I address some of the most common questions about PFAS in Texas. These responses are meant to be concise and fact-driven, drawing from state and federal sources. You should speak with healthcare or legal professionals to get guidance specific to your situation.

Confirmed PFAS contamination has been reported in limited areas, including two wells in Salt Lake City and parts of Park City’s drinking water system. Military sites, airports, and industrial locations might also be affected by historical use of firefighting foam or industrial waste. While most drinking water sources remain under the current EPA advisory limits, the DEQ is expanding its investigations to ensure thorough monitoring.

Start by contacting your local water provider to ask for data on recent PFAS testing. If they do not offer results or if you use a private well, you can arrange testing through a state-certified lab. The Utah DEQ occasionally has programs that cover testing in high-risk areas. Farmers wishing to test soil or irrigation water can also use private environmental labs, so long as appropriate sampling guidelines are followed.

Studies link PFAS to several health conditions, including kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disorders, elevated cholesterol, and potential immune dysfunction. In Utah specifically, epidemiological data highlights higher rates of kidney and testicular cancers in communities affected by these chemicals. Research also suggests that long-term PFAS exposure may contribute to liver damage and certain birth defects.

It is possible to pursue a lawsuit if you suspect your illness or property damage arises from known PFAS contamination. Attorneys typically review water-test and medical records to determine your eligibility. Cases may target manufacturers of PFAS-based products, local operators who allowed contamination to spread, or other responsible parties. If you think you may have a claim, you can consult resources such as the Legal Claim Assistant PFAS Lawsuit page to explore your options.

Filing a PFAS claim often begins with gathering evidence: documentation of medical diagnoses, water-test results, and potential exposures. A qualified attorney can help prove that contamination caused or contributed to your health issues or property losses. From there, a court may decide on remedies or settlements. Understanding MCL exceedances, liability, and damages is critical. For more detailed information, check out Legal Claim Assistant’s resources.

I hope this overview helps you make informed decisions regarding PFAS contamination in Utah. While many public water systems are still safely below action levels, it is wise to stay updated on any emerging data, especially if you or people you know have faced health complications that might be linked to PFAS exposure. If you believe you qualify for a claim, working with an experienced legal team can guide you through each step ahead.

Find out if you're eligible and may be eligible for compensation.
Get your Free Case Review and Maximize You Payout With the Help From Legal Claim Assistant.
Get A Free Case Review
Free

Overview PFAS contamination in the USA

Here you van find the PFAS watercontamination map of the United States. Find, state by state, where water contamination has occurred due to PFAS exposure.

Share this article:

Related Article