PFAS in Washington

Last updated: July 9, 2025
Contributor: nicky

I have spent considerable time reviewing the facts surrounding PFAS in Washington. PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, have shown up in the state’s drinking water supplies, farmland, and industrial sites. Public health officials, researchers, and residents alike are mindful of the potential health consequences. Through this guide, I hope to share reliable data about where these chemicals come from, how they can affect health, and how Washington is responding. My goal is to arm you with clear, factual information so you can make informed decisions about testing your water or soil, identifying exposure risks for yourself or your family, and exploring whether you qualify for a PFAS lawsuit.

What are PFAS and why are they dangerous?

PFAS are synthetic compounds that have been in use since the 1950s. Often found in products like nonstick cookware, food packaging, cleaning agents, carpets, and firefighting foam, these substances are chemically stable and resistant to heat. Their resilience, which is beneficial in manufacturing, also allows them to linger in the environment for a very long time.

I recognize that the key concern with PFAS is their ability to bioaccumulate, meaning they can build up in human tissues. Over time, higher levels in the body might be linked to health problems. Several well-known PFAS include perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). Researchers have studied PFOS and PFOA more extensively than other PFAS, and their findings often point to potential harm such as kidney or liver damage.

Many health agencies classify certain PFAS as possible carcinogens. Scientists also associate PFAS with reproductive and developmental problems. In Washington, the state government has taken these risks seriously. Beginning in 2021, the Washington State Board of Health instituted rules requiring public drinking water systems to test for PFAS by 2025, emphasizing that any results above specified action levels must be shared with consumers within 30 days. This underscores the concern over how persistent these chemicals are once they enter water sources.

Overall, PFAS represent a major environmental challenge. Their capability to remain in soil, groundwater, and living tissues for decades makes them dangerous. While not all PFAS are equally harmful, the strong chemical bonds in these substances make them resistant to both natural degradation and conventional treatment methods.

Where are PFAS found in Washington?

PFAS contamination in Washington has been documented by state authorities in multiple ways. According to the Washington State Department of Ecology, PFAS chemicals have been discovered at industrial facilities, airports, military sites, and even in local landfills. Government responders routinely test these locations, because PFAS can move quickly through water and are notably difficult to remove once they enter the environment.

As I looked into PFAS Washington testing data, I was struck by the variety of places affected. The Department of Health (DOH) has noted that certain areas with high industrial activity appear more prone to PFAS discharges, especially locations that used or produced materials coated with PFAS for stain resistance or durability. Fire-training sites where firefighting foam has been used repeatedly are also common sources.

Rural communities are not necessarily exempt. PFAS from older landfills, sewage sludge applied on farmland, or contaminated wastewater can migrate. Industrial or military sites in central, eastern, and western parts of the state have all seen varying levels of PFAS. Some counties have reported consistent contamination levels in groundwater, prompting immediate testing. In many areas, the DOH continues statewide monitoring programs to better map out where PFAS occur and how they spread.

The concern does not rest solely on industrial hotspots. PFAS can end up in consumer products that wash into drains, eventually entering wastewater treatment plants that were never designed to filter out these chemicals. As a result, PFAS can show up in waterways and get taken up by municipal water systems or even in private wells.

Find out if you're eligible and may be eligible for compensation.

Get your Free Case Review and Maximize You Payout With the Help From Legal Claim Assistant.

Get A Free Case Review

Free

PFAS in Washington’s drinking water

Water contamination is one of the most pressing aspects of PFAS pollution. Because these chemicals do not break down easily, they can remain in reservoirs, rivers, wells, and other water sources. Washington’s drinking water regulations have become more stringent in recent years, reflecting growing concern.

Contaminated water systems and affected counties

The Washington State Board of Health’s 2021 rule on PFAS in drinking water set the stage for rigorous testing. Over 2,400 public drinking water systems must complete PFAS screening by December 2025. If a system detects PFAS above the state action level, the utility is required to notify customers within 30 days. Some counties have already flagged elevated PFAS levels, especially in areas close to firefighting foam discharge sites or industrial complexes.

“As soon as we see PFAS levels above the action threshold, we urge water systems to notify residents and to begin more frequent sampling,” said a Washington State Board of Health spokesperson. This statement underscores the commitment to transparency. In most cases, publicly accessible dashboards supplied by the Department of Health allow residents to see test outcomes for their local system.

Counties such as Snohomish, Pierce, and certain parts of Spokane have recorded PFAS detections. While not every source tests above the threshold, these detections illustrate why consistent monitoring is considered critical for safeguarding public health.

Sources of PFAS: Firefighting foam, industry, military bases

One major source identified in PFAS Washington data is firefighting foam, technically known as Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF). AFFF has been used at airports, military installations, oil refineries, and other locations prone to large fires. When foam-based trainings or firefighting activities happen repeatedly, PFAS can seep into groundwater.

Industrial facilities that make textiles, electronics, or other specialty goods are also implicated in PFAS discharges. Historically, PFAS were used to make products more durable. Over the years, many plants disposed of waste in landfills or drains. Without specialized treatment, PFAS can leach from these waste sites. This pattern has been widely documented in Washington, especially near older industrial hubs.

Military bases have drawn significant attention too. Both the U.S. Department of Defense and the Washington State Department of Ecology have tracked contamination near bases that used AFFF formulations. Many contamination incidents predate the current rules, making it essential to investigate older sources of PFAS that might still affect present-day water.

EPA and Washington State Department of Health data

On a national level, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) supports states in their testing efforts. For Washington, EPA-approved methods like Method 537.1 and Method 533 measure various PFAS analytes, including PFOS and PFOA. Results from these tests feed into dashboards or online repositories maintained by the DOH, so the public can see how much PFAS is found in local water.

In many cases, local health departments and water systems collaborate with the EPA to conduct follow-up investigations. Data from these efforts show that while PFAS levels may be higher around industrial or firefighting areas, background contamination can occur anywhere. Officials report that removing PFAS from water can be challenging and often involves structured treatments like granular activated carbon (GAC) or ion exchange (IX) systems.

PFAS in Washington’s soil and agriculture

Beyond water, PFAS have the ability to contaminate soil, particularly in agricultural settings. Farmers rely on clean water and soil to produce safe crops and livestock products. PFAS infiltration can introduce long-term risks to the food supply.

PFAS in farmland and food supply

PFAS chemicals can latch onto soil particles and remain for decades. If farmland has been irrigated with PFAS-containing water or if biosolids containing PFAS were used as fertilizer, the chemicals can end up in crops. Authorities like the Washington State Department of Ecology emphasize that once PFAS enter farmland, it can be costly and complex to remove them fully.

According to available data, PFAS levels in foods grown in impacted soil can be particularly concerning for dairy, livestock feed, and produce. In study samples, PFAS have been detected in garden vegetables and grains. Over time, if animals ingest PFAS through feed or water, these substances may accumulate in their tissues, including milk and meat.

Risks to crops and livestock

The health implications for livestock parallel those for humans, as PFAS can become part of an animal’s body fluids or fat stores. Dairy cows consuming contaminated water might have PFAS residues in their milk, which can then enter the human food chain. It is also possible for these substances to be found in eggs from poultry that drink PFAS-tainted water.

Although FSMA (Food Safety Modernization Act) guidelines generally help ensure quality control, PFAS remain notoriously difficult to detect without specialized testing. The mobility of PFAS in soil and water means repeated accumulation may occur over time. For farmers, these factors raise serious concerns regarding marketability, food safety, and even potential legal liabilities.

Health effects of PFAS exposure

From my vantage point, the most pressing question is how PFAS can affect individual health. According to the Washington State Department of Health, daily exposure to PFAS through water or consumer products may influence kidney function, immune responses, and cholesterol levels. Certain PFAS also appear to disrupt hormonal balances, potentially impacting thyroid function.

Additionally, studies have associated PFAS with various cancers, including kidney and testicular cancers. Scientists investigating PFAS discovered that these substances may hamper some vaccine responses in children and pose developmental risks for unborn babies. While research is ongoing, many public health agencies recommend reducing unnecessary exposure as a precautionary measure.

The fact that PFAS remain in the body for an extended period means that even small, routine exposures can add up. The state’s push for comprehensive PFAS testing in water is partly an effort to reduce the likelihood that residents unknowingly consume these chemicals at higher-than-necessary levels.

Diseases linked to PFAS exposure in Washington

In Washington, some individuals living near known contamination zones or working with PFAS have developed health conditions believed to be associated with these chemicals. Although not everyone exposed will become ill, patterns in epidemiological data point to specific conditions that could be linked to prolonged PFAS exposure.

Kidney cancer

Kidney cancer is one of the cancers prominently mentioned in PFAS-related health literature. When I looked at various peer-reviewed medical studies, some suggested that people with higher PFAS concentrations in their blood had an increased incidence of kidney tumors. The potential mechanism revolves around how PFAS may affect metabolic pathways and cell regulation.

According to state health officials, kidney cancer rates remain under review in certain Washington communities with historical PFAS contamination. While no conclusive statement claims PFAS alone causes kidney cancer, the correlation is strong enough that state agencies consider it a high priority.

Testicular cancer

Testicular cancer has also been linked to PFAS exposure in several epidemiological studies that looked at communities with especially high PFAS levels. The concern is that PFAS may alter endocrine function, increasing vulnerabilities in reproductive organs. In local surveys, Washington residents who worked with firefighting foam or in industrial plants handling PFAS-based products showed elevated PFAS levels in their blood.

Though the research remains ongoing, some doctors in Washington recommend that individuals who suspect significant PFAS exposure consult their healthcare providers about consistent screenings. Early detection is essential for most cancers, and heightened awareness could improve outcomes for those affected.

Thyroid disorders

Thyroid disorders, including hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism, may be more common in people exposed to PFAS. Researchers note that PFAS can mimic or interfere with thyroid hormones, which regulate metabolism, energy levels, and many other bodily functions.

In Washington, doctors and public health investigators see potential connections in certain communities. “We are studying patients with unusually high PFAS blood concentrations to see if they have higher rates of thyroid disease,” said a Department of Health representative. While results are not definitive in every case, the DOH continues to gather data that might inform future advisories about PFAS exposure.

Liver damage

Liver damage is another concern. Elevated levels of PFAS sometimes appear to change how the liver processes fats and other substances. Long-term buildup of PFAS might lead to changes in liver enzymes. Over time, these changes could raise the risk of chronic liver conditions.

Some individuals in Washington whose water tested high for PFAS reported issues with elevated cholesterol and abnormal liver function tests, prompting medical professionals to investigate the possibility of PFAS as a contributing factor.

Immune suppression and developmental issues

Finally, there are indications that PFAS could suppress immune response and affect child development. Studies have highlighted how PFAS exposure in pregnant women may correlate with lower birth weights or developmental delays in young children. For individuals undergoing vaccinations, PFAS exposure might slightly reduce the desired immune response.

Though scientists cannot always tease out cause and effect, numerous health agencies caution that individuals in high-exposure areas should monitor immune-related health metrics more closely. These findings are one of the reasons Washington sets action levels for public water supplies, aiming to prevent these developmental and immune-related outcomes.

How is Washington responding to PFAS contamination?

Washington agencies are proactive in tackling PFAS contamination. I have observed that the umbrella of state, federal, and local authorities is quite robust, forming a coordinated network. The Department of Ecology, the Department of Health, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) all contribute to regulations, oversight, and mitigation projects.

Washington State Department of Ecology initiatives

In 2021, the Washington State Department of Ecology joined forces with the Department of Health, industry representatives, and community organizations to create a PFAS Chemical Action Plan. This plan sought to identify, reduce, and eventually phase out unchecked uses of PFAS. As part of its execution, the Department of Ecology monitors known PFAS hotspots, supports cleanup efforts, and informs the public about risks.

Additionally, the departments of Ecology and Health are working on a multiyear statewide funding strategy for 2025-27 and 2027-29. This strategy includes at least 31 recommendations to further reduce PFAS usage, upgrade infrastructure, and expand testing in high-risk areas. The aim is to provide financial and regulatory support for local communities facing unmanageable contamination costs.

EPA support and oversight

The EPA offers guidelines and updated health advisories to states with PFAS-related issues. In Washington, local authorities typically follow these federal standards, which list acceptable thresholds for PFOS, PFOA, and other PFAS. The EPA’s method approval also helps detections remain consistent across different labs, improving data reliability.

Federal agencies have sometimes collaborated with Washington officials on site-specific cleanups, especially in military and industrial locales. According to federal sources, the national goal is to set legally enforceable Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for certain PFAS in the near future. The state’s push for earlier deadlines, such as the 2025 testing requirement, indicates a willingness to go beyond federal minimums if it means better protection for residents.

Local government and community testing programs

Counties and municipalities often launch their own testing programs, particularly if a known PFAS source is nearby. Some water utilities, upon detecting PFAS levels above the state action level, partner with engineering firms or research institutions to install specialized filtration. In certain affected towns, local authorities also have recommended that residents consider certified home water filters that reduce PFAS levels.

Communities have sometimes organized grassroots sampling campaigns. These involve collecting private well water or soil samples to ensure no contamination remains undetected. By pooling resources with local universities, citizen-led groups strengthen official data and create transparency about the extent of PFAS problems.

Can you test your water or soil for PFAS in Washington?

Yes, and I believe testing can be a critical step in understanding your personal risk. Public water systems are already regulated to test for PFAS. If you rely on a private well, you can hire an accredited laboratory to run PFAS analyses under EPA-approved methods (537.1 or 533). These tests identify up to two dozen PFAS analytes, including PFOS and PFOA.

It is important to follow recommended sampling protocols, because improper technique might generate false positives or negatives. If you do test your water and find elevated PFAS levels, you can install in-home filtration like granular activated carbon or ion exchange systems. The Washington State Department of Health encourages immediate retesting after you address a contamination source to confirm that PFAS levels are reduced.

Soil testing is similarly specialized but may be warranted if your property is near a known PFAS release site, such as a training area for firefighting foam. For farmland, understanding PFAS levels can help you decide which crops to grow or whether you need to adjust irrigation practices to protect your livelihood.

Do you qualify for a PFAS lawsuit in Washington?

You might wonder about potential legal alternatives if you have experienced health problems or property damage from PFAS in Washington. Generally, lawsuits target entities responsible for manufacturing, distributing, or disposing of PFAS in a negligent manner. For instance, companies that failed to disclose known risks of PFAS or that improperly managed their wastewater may face legal accountability.

If you suspect a link between your PFAS exposure and a serious medical condition like kidney cancer, testicular cancer, or another PFAS-related illness, you might qualify for legal recourse. Often, these claims can include compensation for medical expenses, reduced property values, lost wages, and pain and suffering. For farmers, contamination that undermines agricultural production or livestock health could also become grounds for a lawsuit.

Before filing, it is wise to gather medical records and any documentation of contamination—lab results, official notices, or water system advisories. You can learn more by checking the PFAS Lawsuit information on Legal Claim Assistant. Exploring your legal options early may help you manage deadlines or statutes of limitation for PFAS-related cases.

Why choose Legal Claim Assistant

I understand that choosing an advocate to guide you through complex litigation can feel overwhelming. Legal Claim Assistant offers a free case review so you can figure out whether you are eligible to file a PFAS lawsuit. Because many PFAS suits are part of larger class actions or mass torts, having a resource that pinpoints the right legal representation is essential.

Legal Claim Assistant collaborates with attorneys who focus on environmental and toxic tort law. These lawyers understand the nuance of PFAS science, local regulations, and typical strategies used by large corporations to defend themselves in contamination cases. By aligning you with specialized counsel, the company helps you pursue compensation in a well-structured manner.

If you want to learn about specific scenarios, visit the PFAS water contamination lawsuit page or the DuPont lawsuit overview. These resources outline common approaches, settlement patterns, and the role of evidence in PFAS-related claims.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

I regularly receive queries about how PFAS contamination unfolds, how to test water, and whether legal action makes sense. Below, I have compiled some of the most common questions and their answers, based on Washington’s specific rules.

Where has PFAS been detected in Virginia?

PFAS have been found in multiple municipal water systems, particularly those near industrial zones, military bases, or airports. According to the Virginia DEQ, 28 drinking water systems exceeded PFAS recommendations as of late 2024. Rural communities sometimes detect PFAS in private wells, especially if located near historical foam-use sites or manufacturing facilities.

If you are curious about PFAS presence in neighboring regions, you can consult resources. Ongoing testing across state lines helps us confirm how widespread contamination is.

Can I test my drinking water for PFAS?

Yes, you can hire specialized labs that perform certified PFAS tests. If you rely on a private well, the Virginia Department of Health and local health agencies recommend testing if you suspect contamination. Public water users can check local water-quality reports or contact their utility for PFAS-related data.

What is the state doing to reduce PFAS contamination?

The state passed laws requiring enhanced monitoring, such as the new PFAS regulations aligning with the EPA’s Maximum Contaminant Levels. Virginia officials also conduct site inspections, issue notices for potential polluters, and coordinate cleanup efforts with the EPA. Funding from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law is earmarked for research and treatment technologies to mitigate PFAS in public water systems.

Are Virginia farms and food supplies affected?

Some farms near contaminated water sources have detected PFAS in soil or irrigation systems. Elevated PFAS might hinder livestock and crop sales if contamination is severe. However, not all farms are impacted to the same degree. Ongoing monitoring by the DEQ, combined with farm-level testing, aims to ensure that produce and livestock meet health and safety standards before entering the marketplace.

What are the health effects of long-term PFAS exposure?

Chronic PFAS exposure may be associated with higher risks of kidney and testicular cancers, thyroid disorders, and immune dysfunction. Research also suggests possible cholesterol increases, particularly in communities with extensive exposure. While the precise danger level of PFAS remains a subject of scientific debate, multiple public-health agencies caution that reducing exposure is prudent, especially for vulnerable populations like children and pregnant women.

Can I file a PFAS lawsuit in Virginia?

You might be eligible to file a lawsuit if you can demonstrate that your health or property was harmed by PFAS contamination, and if you can identify the responsible party. Companies that knowingly discharged PFAS, sold firefighting foams, or contributed to contamination through their operations have been the primary targets of these suits. I encourage you to consider a free case review from Legal Claim Assistant to see whether your situation meets the typical criteria.

Legal Claim Assistant specializes in connecting individuals with legal professionals who can investigate exposure pathways and advise on next steps.